The freight has no ordinary corrective move
A transformer or machine cannot be redistributed like palletized freight.
For heavy haul
When the freight cannot be split, “move the pallet” is not an answer. Identify the overloaded groups, test the equipment and corridor, and send genuine permit candidates into the right review path.
Where the current process breaks
A transformer or machine cannot be redistributed like palletized freight.
More axles can improve group allowance while the combination still requires an overweight permit.
Clearance, structure, grade, weather and permit conditions belong in the same review.
The workflow
Use actual axle positions, ratings, dimensions and centre of gravity.
Show the statutory or equipment limit for every relevant axle group.
Review truck restrictions, elevation, grades and the planned operating conditions.
Send non-divisible over-limit loads to permit review with the overage and route context attached.
What changes
No invented savings figure. These are the changes the workflow is designed to produce and the claims you can test during rollout.
Stop spending time on a redistribution that cannot solve the load.
See how axle count, spacing and position change the group results.
Carry the groups, overages, dimensions and corridor into the workflow.
AxleGuard identifies and tracks permit candidates; it does not issue a government permit.
Solves where the weight actually sits, axle by axle.
When the load cannot be made legal, route it to a permit.
See the terrain and conditions that distance alone hides.
A road that fits the truck, and a load that passes the scale on it.
Good fit when
Not what this page promises
Questions
No. It identifies permit candidates and carries the load, equipment and route information into review. Issuance remains with the responsible authority and permit workflow.
The data model supports multi-axle equipment, but each geometry and solver case must be verified during implementation. Unsupported combinations must be stated rather than approximated silently.
No. It can organize provider restrictions and route intelligence. A required field survey, engineering review or authority approval remains a separate source of evidence.
Evaluate it with evidence
Keep the process you use today beside it. Resolve every disagreement before the result is used operationally.